Intel Arc Battlemage leak doubles core count and triples L2 over A770
Notebookcheck.biz filed a report on 29 March 2023 carrying RedGamingTech figures for the Arc Battlemage: 64 Xe cores, 48 MB L2, and a clock above 3 GHz.
| Arc Battlemage (leaked) | Arc A770 | |
|---|---|---|
| Xe cores | 64 | 32 |
| L2 cache | 48 MB | 16 MB |
| Memory bus | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Clock | >3 GHz | 2400 MHz |
| Die size | ≈379 mm² (AD103 ref) | 406 mm² |
Notebookcheck.biz filed a report on 29 March 2023 carrying figures attributed to Paul of RedGamingTech: 64 Xe cores, 48 MB of L2 cache, a 256-bit bus, and a clock above 3 GHz for the Arc Battlemage. The page anchors the monolithic die to the AD103 at 379 mm² and notes that the part would bring significant improvements in machine learning and ray tracing. None of these numbers carry an Intel confirmation, and the article itself warns that contradictory reports exist across leaker channels and that the RedGamingTech figures should be taken with caution.
The table below lines the Battlemage figures against the Arc A770, which the same page lists at 32 Xe cores, 16 MB L2, 256-bit bus, 2400 MHz, and a 406 mm² die. The bus width does not change between generations; the core count doubles, the L2 triples, and the clock climbs roughly 25 percent, which is a meaningful step for a part that was already the top of Intel's consumer lineup. What the table does not show is whether those 64 cores are all enabled on a single monolithic die or whether the 379 mm² reference is a ceiling rather than a target, and no process node or memory type is stated for the new part.
Die Brief reads the contradiction between Paul's Q1/Q2 2024 timeline and Moore's Law Is Dead's second-half 2024 claim as the real constraint here, because a monolithic die at AD103 scale with 64 Xe cores and 48 MB of L2 is a yield problem at Intel's 7 nm process. The buyer who plans a 2024 refresh around this part is planning around a number that two independent leakers disagree on, and the article's own caution flag makes that disagreement the operative fact rather than the spec sheet. Paul also names a data-center variant, Melville Sound, for the second half of 2024, but no core count, clock, or TDP is given for that SKU, and the performance claim of at least RTX 4070 Ti with a possible RTX 4080 ceiling is Paul's own extrapolation, not a measured figure.
What is still unmeasured: memory type and capacity, TDP, official SKU names, pricing, and any benchmark. The 3 GHz figure is a floor, not a target, and no statement in the article says whether it applies to all SKUs or only the top bin, while the 379 mm² reference is borrowed from a competitor's part and does not confirm the Battlemage's actual die size. Until Intel publishes a spec sheet or a silicon sample reaches a lab, every number in this table is a leaker's claim.
The contradiction between Paul's Q1/Q2 2024 timeline and MLID's second-half 2024 claim is the operative constraint, not the spec sheet. A monolithic die at AD103 scale with 64 cores and 48 MB L2 is a yield problem that Intel has not confirmed.
Memory type and capacity, TDP, official SKU names, pricing, and any benchmark remain unmeasured.
Two independent leakers disagree on the launch window. The monolithic die at AD103 scale with 64 Xe cores and 48 MB L2 at Intel's 7 nm process is a yield constraint that no spec sheet has confirmed.
After @The_Display_Guy. We did not report this. The pictures, if any, are theirs. Also filed by Igor's Lab, notebookcheck.net.

