GUNNIR's filing describes a workstation built around two Arc Pro B70 boards, with 64GB of VRAM and liquid cooling. VideoCardz's page linked from the tweet is the only source in the packet. It names the board count, the memory total, and the cooling method, but it does not split the memory between the two cards. Cooling detail matters because two boards in one enclosure need a thermal path, but the filing gives no pump, radiator, or flow numbers.

The limit is the two-board configuration, and the measurement is 64GB of VRAM. That total sits inside the limit only as an aggregate, not as proof of one addressable pool. A buyer should treat the figure as a configuration claim until the interconnect, per-board memory, and driver behavior are measured. Die Brief treats the missing interconnect as the deciding gap.

Interconnect, PCIe generation, clock speed, TDP, die size, and process node are absent from the document. No other page in the packet cross-checks the 64GB figure. Until those numbers appear, the workstation remains a cooling and memory claim, not a performance measurement.

Die Brief treats the 64GB figure as an aggregate claim across two Arc Pro B70 boards, not proof of one addressable pool. The buyer is constrained until the interconnect, per-board memory, and driver behavior are measured.

The document leaves out interconnect, PCIe generation, clock speed, TDP, die size, and process node.

Treat 64GB as total VRAM across two boards unless a single addressable pool is shown. The missing interconnect and per-board split block any performance or capacity conclusion.