Colorful lists a 32GB iGame Shadow II DDR5-6000 CL30 kit in China at 3,999 yuan. Two 16GB DIMMs make the kit, and the profile is 6000 MT/s with CL30-38-38 at 1.4V on a 10-layer board. XMP 3.0 and EXPO profiles are present, but the listing says the rated speed needs a compatible processor and motherboard.

The wire headline rounds the price to "$600", while the listing says 3,999 yuan. The desk trusts the Colorful listing, and the number that decides it is 3,999 yuan. The subhead also points to CXMT, but the listing does not name the DRAM maker, so the supplier claim is not in the primary document.

The constraint sits with the platform, not the DIMM, because the 6000 MT/s rating is a profile, not a guaranteed JEDEC state. The 500-yuan premium over the CL36 kit prices latency, not bandwidth. The listing does not prove that the DRAM node or supplier is CXMT, because Colorful does not name the maker. For the buyer, the step is a latency tax, and for the module maker it is a way to sell domestic DRAM under a branded kit.

Still unmeasured are the DRAM node, wattage, full launch date, and contact resistance for the insertion marks. It also leaves out the SKU and any measured thermal result for now. No second page fills the gap.

The platform, not the DIMM, is the constraint, because the 6000 MT/s rating is a profile that needs BIOS enablement. The 500-yuan step prices latency, and the listing still does not prove the DRAM supplier.

The document leaves out the DRAM node, wattage, full launch date, SKU, and measured contact resistance.

The 6000 MT/s CL30 profile is platform-dependent, so the buyer pays 500 yuan for lower latency without proof of DRAM node or supplier.